It has reached a very critical stage and it has progressed well so far, and if it had followed the same path in the past, we would have reached a win-win agreement.

Mahmoud Abbaszadeh Meshkini said: "We need to reach a clear conclusion in some sensitive cases, and if we do not reach a conclusion in these cases, the principles of the agreement will not be easily achievable. We are ready to respond to the Western concerns about our nuclear activities." Let's solve it and we have both seriousness and good faith in this.
“We are working within International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safeguards and we are ready to address their concerns,” he said in response to a question about Western enrichment requests. and whether there would be an agreement on enrichment levels. It's not about the level of enrichment, and we should have all of our activities based on Atomic Energy Organization safeguards, and with that we can address their concerns.
The MP stressed: The Islamic Republic of Iran demands the lifting of sanctions and operational and practical guarantees in this regard.
For this confidence to return, the Americans must respect their commitments vis-à-vis the UN Security Council. If the West and the Americans are in good faith and serious, a win-win agreement is possible.
"We don't go into specifics, but what is important to us is that the sanctions that need to be lifted are on sanctions like Katsa," a spokesman for the House of Commons National Security Committee said. and foreign policy. they're not assigned, I don't think we'll come to a conclusion soon.
Abbaszadeh spoke to Biden about the letter from the US Congress on negotiations with Iran: "It was not the right time to write the letter from the US Congress to Biden and the text was not correct and I do not think that this letter is uncoordinated. “The president has been asked not to rush into an agreement until the Americans have the necessary guarantees to lift the sanctions.
We believe the Americans need a deal more than we do.